Guide for Jaypee Infratech Homebuyers

Stopping Suraksha’s Alleged Financial Exploitation

🟦 Purpose

This guide explains Suraksha Realty’s non-compliance with the NCLT-approved Resolution Plan for Jaypee Infratech Ltd. (JIL) and provides fast, effective legal remedies for homebuyers.

Use this guide to file correct claims, complaints, and actions to stop:

inflated/compound interest
revived and extinguished dues
coercion or threats
illegal SOA entries
cancellation threats
denial of possession

Always consult an IBC-specialist lawyer before filing legal petitions.

1️⃣ Background: NCLT Resolution Plan (Binding Under IBC Section 31)

The NCLT (Allahabad Bench) approved Suraksha Realty’s plan on 7 March 2023. The plan is final and binding on Suraksha, JIL, banks, authorities, and all allottees.

✔ Key binding provisions

Homebuyers’ admitted claims: ₹12,806 crore
All pre-approval interest, dues, penalties extinguished
Project timelines fixed (e.g., 42 months for Noida towers)
Refunds capped at ₹178 crore (no pre-approval interest)
Post-approval interest simple and capped at 12%
No retrospective interest recalculation allowed

2️⃣ Reported Violations by Suraksha

🔵 Unlawful Financial Demands

Compound interest >20% p.a.
Interest inflated from ₹1.26 lakh → ₹19 lakh in some cases
Charges outside the resolution plan
Revival of extinguished interest (illegal under IBC)

🔵 Coercion & Intimidation

Threats of cancellation
Denial of possession until illegal dues paid
Refusal to share correct SOA
Misleading deadlines or pressure tactics

🔵 Delays & Non-Transparency

Slow construction, inadequate manpower
YEIDA notices in Aug 2025
Unexplained SOA entries, mismatched adjustments

🔵 Possible Violations

Contempt of NCLT
Criminal breach of trust & cheating (IPC 406, 420)
Forgery (IPC 467/468/471)
IBC Section 31 violation (binding plan not followed)

3️⃣ Recent Developments (as of Nov 2025)

✔ Supreme Court Order (7 Nov 2025)

Final deadline: 5 December 2025
All homebuyers can submit Refund / Allotment / Settlement claims
No rejection due to past lapses
Suraksha must accept all filings

✔ Enforcement Directorate (13 Nov 2025)

Arrest of ex-Jaypee Chairman Manoj Gaur
Alleged money laundering of ₹14,599 crore homebuyer funds
Strengthens homebuyers’ systemic wrongdoing argument

4️⃣ Role of the Implementation & Monitoring Committee (IMC)

Formed in April 2024 to ensure strict implementation of the NCLT plan.

IMC handles:

dispute correction
escrow oversight
monthly compliance reports
SOA corrections

First escalation should be to IMC:

🔗 jaypeeinfratech.com/imc

Always attach:

demand letters
payment proofs
SOA comparisons
NCLT order

5️⃣ Recommended Legal Remedies (Fastest to Most Powerful)

🟩 A. BEST QUICK REMEDY: NCLT – Section 60(5) IBC

This is the strongest, fastest, and most effective remedy.

✔ Why?

Only NCLT can enforce the approved resolution plan
Can strike down inflated/illegal SOA entries
Can penalize Suraksha under IBC Section 74
Can direct IMC to correct dues immediately
Specialized jurisdiction → fastest outcome

✔ What to File?

A Section 60(5) IBC application seeking:

strict enforcement of plan
removal of inflated interest
quashing of illegal SOAs
contempt for non-compliance
direction to issue corrected SOA
direction to stop coercive practices

✔ Merits

Strongest legal force
Binding outcome
Fast compared to courts
Appeals to NCLAT → Supreme Court

✔ Limitations

Needs documented fraud or SOA mismatch

🟨 B. High Court – Article 226 (Writ)

Good when government authorities fail or act arbitrarily.

Use when:

YEIDA/Noida Authority fails to enforce RERA or NCLT plan
Immediate interim stay is needed
Suraksha threatens cancellation

Limitations

High Court may ask you to first approach NCLT
Cannot resolve contract/commercial disputes

🟥 C. Supreme Court – Article 32 (Fundamental Rights)

Use only when violations affect thousands of homebuyers.

When appropriate

After NCLT + High Court remedies fail
For mass violations of:
- Article 21 (right to life/shelter)
- Article 300A (right to property)
For contempt of Supreme Court directions (like Dec 5 deadline)

Why powerful?

SC previously saved Jaypee homebuyers (Chitra Sharma, 2018).

6️⃣ Other Parallel Remedies (Optional but Effective)

🟦 RERA

For delayed construction
For possession issues
Compensation case

🟧 Consumer Commission

For unfair trade practices
Mental harassment
Misleading financial demands

🟥 Criminal FIR (Cheating / Forgery)

Sections: 406, 420, 506, 467/468/471, 120B.
Use if intimidation, fraud, or forged SOAs.
If police refuse → use CrPC 156(3) before Magistrate.

7️⃣ Immediate Action for Homebuyers (Quick Checklist)

✔ 1. Submit SC claim before 5 December 2025

Choose Refund / Allotment / Settlement (preferred).

✔ 2. Do NOT pay any inflated interest

Illegal under NCLT.

✔ 3. File Settlement for SOA Correction

This prevents illegal deduction from refund or possession.

✔ 4. Collect Evidence

SOA 2017 vs SOA 2025
Emails / demands
Payment proofs
NCLT order copies

✔ 5. Unite

Joint actions get 10× stronger NCLT impact.

✔ 6. Consult IBC-specialist lawyer

They know how to enforce Section 31 + 60(5).

8️⃣ Conclusion — Best Quick Remedy (Clear Verdict)

🟩 Most Powerful & Fastest Remedy: NCLT Section 60(5)

This is the primary weapon to:

stop inflated interest
stop coercion
get corrected SOA
enforce NCLT plan
punish Suraksha for non-compliance
secure possession/refund without illegal deductions

🟨 High Court (Art. 226)** → backup for urgent stay/authority failures

🟥 Supreme Court (Art. 32)** → ultimate remedy for mass violations

Homebuyers have full protection under IBC. Suraksha cannot override the NCLT-approved plan.
Stay united, file timely, and document everything.

9️⃣ Disclaimer

This guide is for information & awareness only.
Not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer before filing.

⭐ Comparison: NCLT Section 60(5) vs High Court 226 Mandamus

🟩 NCLT – Section 60(5) IBC (BEST for your issue)

CAN handle your issue? → ✔ Yes
Fastest & most accurate? → ✔ Yes
Enforces Resolution Plan? → ✔ Yes
Stops illegal interest? → ✔ Yes
Issues contempt against Suraksha? → ✔ Yes
Bound by IBC? → ✔ Yes
SC-approved jurisdiction? → ✔ Yes
Can High Court override it? → ❌ No

🟥 High Court – Article 226 Mandamus

CAN handle your issue? → ❌ Mostly No
Can enforce NCLT-approved Plan? → ❌ No
Can remove illegal interest? → ❌ No (commercial/IBC matters barred)
Can quash SOA revision? → ❌ No
Will HC give stay? → ❌ Usually dismiss because NCLT exists
When useful? → Only when YEIDA / Govt Authorities fail or for fundamental rights
Risk: Case dismissed → waste of time & money

⭐ When is High Court (Art. 226) genuinely useful?

ONLY in these scenarios:

✔ Government Authority Failure

YEIDA not issuing occupancy
Noida Authority violating regulations
Govt inaction
RERA inaction

✔ To get urgent STAY

E.g., stay demolition, stay coercive govt actions.

✔ Fundamental Rights

Right to shelter (Article 21)
Right to property (Article 300A)

❌ NOT for SOA, Interest, NCLT Plan Violations

Those belong ONLY to NCLT/NCLAT, due to IBC’s supremacy: Under IBC Section 238:

“IBC overrides all other laws.”

⭐ FINAL VERDICT (for Jaypee-Suraksha Homebuyers)

🟩 1. BEST & MOST EFFECTIVE REMEDY

👉 NCLT – Section 60(5) IBC

For:

inflated interest
illegal SOA entries
coercion
contempt
plan violations
revival of extinguished dues

🟨 2. SECOND REMEDY (Only for govt issues)

👉 High Court – Article 226 (Mandamus)

For:

YEIDA
Noida Authority
Govt failures
Urgent stay
NOT for interest correction.

🟥 3. SUPREME COURT – Article 32

For:

large-scale violation
if NCLT + HC both fail
fundamental rights breach
contempt of SC’s December 5 direction

Prepared by- @suveshvsaa13 / X

Sign & Share A Petition

Email: "ind.vision47@gmail.com"

Published: 24 Nov 2025

Join Group (WhatsApp)

1️⃣ Background: NCLT Resolution Plan (Binding Under IBC Section 31)

​​

✔ Key binding provisions

​

2️⃣ Reported Violations by Suraksha

🔵 Unlawful Financial Demands

​

🔵 Coercion & Intimidation

​

🔵 Delays & Non-Transparency

​

🔵 Possible Violations

​

3️⃣ Recent Developments (as of Nov 2025)

​​

✔ Supreme Court Order (7 Nov 2025)

​

✔ Enforcement Directorate (13 Nov 2025)

​

4️⃣ Role of the Implementation & Monitoring Committee (IMC)

​​

First escalation should be to IMC:

​

5️⃣ Recommended Legal Remedies (Fastest to Most Powerful)

​

​

🟩 A. BEST QUICK REMEDY: NCLT – Section 60(5) IBC

​

✔ Why?

​

✔ What to File?

​

✔ Merits

​

✔ Limitations

​

🟨 B. High Court – Article 226 (Writ)

​

Use when:

​

Limitations

​

🟥 C. Supreme Court – Article 32 (Fundamental Rights)

​

When appropriate

​

Why powerful?

​

6️⃣ Other Parallel Remedies (Optional but Effective)

​

🟦 RERA

​

🟧 Consumer Commission

​

🟥 Criminal FIR (Cheating / Forgery)

​

7️⃣ Immediate Action for Homebuyers (Quick Checklist)

​

✔ 1. Submit SC claim before 5 December 2025

​

✔ 2. Do NOT pay any inflated interest

​

✔ 3. File Settlement for SOA Correction

​

✔ 4. Collect Evidence

✔ 5. Unite

✔ 6. Consult IBC-specialist lawyer

8️⃣ Conclusion — Best Quick Remedy (Clear Verdict)

​

🟩 Most Powerful & Fastest Remedy: NCLT Section 60(5)

​

🟨 High Court (Art. 226)** → backup for urgent stay/authority failures

​

​

🟥 Supreme Court (Art. 32)** → ultimate remedy for mass violations

​

9️⃣ Disclaimer

​

⭐ Comparison: NCLT Section 60(5) vs High Court 226 Mandamus

​